Total Quality Management

March 12, 2009

Stakeholders and Corporate Social Responsibility

Let’s begin this topic with quotation of Robert W. Lane, the Chairman and CEO of Deere & Company, “If you don’t have honesty and integrity, you won’t be able to develop effective relationships with any of your stakeholders.”

These stakeholder groups form the basis of success and failure of the business. Stakeholders are individuals or groups that have interests, rights, or ownership in an organization and its activities. Customers, suppliers, employees, and shareholders are example of primary stakeholder groups. Each has interest in how an organization performs or interacts with them. These stakeholder groups can benefit from a company’s success and can be harmed by its mistakes.

Secondary stakeholders are also important because they can take action that can damage or assist the organization. Secondary stakeholders include governments (especially through regulatory agencies), unions, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), activities, political action groups, and the media.

In orders to serve their stakeholders in an ethical and social manner, more and more organizations are adapting the model of corporate social responsibility. The term Corporate Social Responsibility goes by many other terms such as corporate citizenship, responsible business or simply corporate responsibility.

Stakeholders of Organization

Stakeholders of Organization

When an organization builds ethical and social elements in its operating philosophy and integrate them in its business model, it is said to have possessed a self-regulating mechanism that guides, monitor and ensure its adherence to law, ethics, and norms in carrying out business activities that ensures the serving the interest of all external and internal stakeholders. In other words, the objective of being socially responsible business is achieved when its activities meet or exceed the expectations of all its stakeholders.

Here is a model for evaluating an organization’s social performance. The model indicates that total corporate social responsibility can be subdivided into four criteria-economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities.

These responsibilities are ordered from bottom to top in the following illustration. Let’s discuss each one  them briefly.

Total Corporate Social Responsibility

Total Corporate Social Responsibility

Economic responsibilities:

The first criterion of social responsibility is economic responsibility. The business institution is, above all, the basic economic unit of society. Its responsibility is to produce goods and services that a society wants and to maximise profit for its owners and shareholders. Economic responsibilities, carried to the extreme, is called profit-maximizing view; it was advocated by Nobel economist Milton Friedman. This view argued that a company should be operated on a profit-oriented basis, with its sole mission to increase its profits so long as is stays withing the rule of the game.

The purely profit-maximizing view is no longer considered an adequate criterion of performance in the world in general. Treating economic gain in the social as the only social responsibility can lead companies into trouble.

Legal responsibilities

All modern societies lay down ground rules, laws and regulations that businesses are expected to follow. Legal responsibility defines what society deems as important with respect to appropriate corporate behavior. Businesses are expected to fulfil their economic goals within the legal framework. Legal requirements are imposed by local councils, state and federal governments and their regulating agencies. Organizations that knowingly break the law are poor performers in this category. Intentionally manufacturing defective goods or billing a client for work not done is illegal. Legal sanctions may include embarrassing public apologies or corporate ‘confessions’.

Ethical responsibilities

Ethical responsibility include behavior that is not necessarily codified into law and may not serve the organization’s direct economic interests. To be ethical, organization’s decision makers should act with equity, fairness and impartiality, respect the rights of individuals, and provide different treatments of individual only when differences between them are relevant to the organization’s goals and tasks. Unethical behavior occurs when decisions enable an individual or organization to gain expense of society.

Discretionary responsibilities

Discretionary responsibility is purely voluntary and guided by an organization’s desire to make social contributions not mandated by economics, laws or ethics. Discretionary activities include generous philanthropic contributions that offer no payback to the organization and are not expected. Discretionary responsibility is the highest criterion of social responsibility, because it goes beyond societal expectations to contribute to the community’s welfare.

Source:

Management, A competency-based approach, Edition 10, by Hellriegel, Jackson, Slocum.

Management, Pacific Rim Edition, by Danny Samson, Richard L.Daft

About these ads

8 Comments »

  1. Interesting…you are developing the ideas of Ed Freeman (stakeholder theory) and Archie Carroll (four levels). Nice diagrams! I’ve posted on this subject…would be glad for your feedback.

    Comment by euandus — October 17, 2009 @ 8:24 pm

  2. I read your post . it was amazing.Your thought process is wonderful.The way you tell about things is awesome. They are inspiring and helpful.Thanks for sharing your information and stories.

    iso 9000

    Comment by ISO 9000 — August 18, 2011 @ 1:28 pm

  3. this information i got from this site was very usefull for my research

    Comment by wood b besayo — October 27, 2011 @ 4:37 pm

  4. I am m.com 1st in stc college banhatti, your notes are nice thanks.

    Comment by Manjunath — November 15, 2011 @ 12:44 pm

  5. Actually nice and very important and understandable lesson. Thanks.

    Comment by Sujith Samaraweera — March 21, 2012 @ 4:22 pm

    • Extremely useful and the way that you were explaining the theory is very clear, excellent presentation skills, you are doing a great job,
      keep up good work and all the best………..

      Comment by Charan — May 26, 2012 @ 6:25 pm

  6. I am very thankful for this web how they have prepared these useful informations.this web really helped me my research. I hope you’ll soon be the most successful web if you go on like this and develop it. Thank you so much.

    Comment by Mohamed abdi osman — May 30, 2012 @ 2:25 pm

  7. But does abiding by the CSR standards potentially cause companies to have conflicting objectives with some stakeholders in some situations?

    Comment by D — June 12, 2012 @ 9:43 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The WordPress Classic Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers

%d bloggers like this: